DFM propositions on platforms – case study by defaqto
27 April 2015
Over the past few years we have seen a proliferation of offerings from those operating in the discretionary investment arena, with varying levels of discretion. Combine these with the multitude of platform-linked propositions and charging structures and it is no wonder those undertaking initial and ongoing due diligence research are finding qualifying suitability a significant task.
This platform-focused case study is designed to help financial advisers and paraplanners understand and navigate the discretionary services on platforms. We have specifically focused on those discretionary services hosted on platforms rather than the direct offerings.
Key subjects covered include:
The different types of discretionary services available on platforms
The key facts to consider and identify when considering discretionary services
The difference between services available on platforms as a combined proposition versus similar ones available directly from the discretionary service provider
The regulatory framework and factors to consider
This CPD-accredited case study also impartially looks specifically at the discretionary services available on the Standard Life platform as an example of a combined platform and discretionary service proposition and takes a deeper dive into their service and the practical implications for advisers and their clients using it.
